[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd
On 6/17/21 1:00 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17-06-21, 13:09, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 6/17/21 12:33 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> On 17-06-21, 10:13, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>> The devfreq driver(exynos-bus.c) has used the dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
>>>> and used the passive governor without the required-opp property.
>>> Which is fine.
>>>> I have a plan to use the required-opp property
>>>> between devfreq drivers (exynos-bus.c) with dev_pm_opp_set_rate().
>>>> I'll support them on later if this approach doesn't break the any
>>>> rule of required-opp property.
>>> You will be required to make some changes in core for that I am
>>> afraid. It won't work automatically.
>> Do you think that better to use clk_enable/regulator_enable directly
>> instead of dev_pm_opp_set_rate() for using required-opp property?
> No. All I am saying is that the OPP core won't work for your use case
> today and may need some updates.

OK. I'll update them for this case.

Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-17 06:08    [W:0.042 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site