lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/3] sched/fair: Take thermal pressure into account while estimating energy
From
Date


On 6/16/21 8:25 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 19:24, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 15/06/2021 18:09, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/15/21 4:31 PM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>>>> On 14/06/2021 21:11, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> It's important to highlight that this will only fix this issue between
>>>> schedutil and EAS when it's due to `thermal pressure` (today only via
>>>> CPU cooling). There are other places which could restrict policy->max
>>>> via freq_qos_update_request() and EAS will be unaware of it.
>>>
>>> True, but for this I have some other plans.
>>
>> As long as people are aware of the fact that this was developed to be
>> beneficial for `EAS - IPA` integration, I'm fine with this.
>
> I don't think it's only for EAS - IPA. Thermal_pressure can be used by
> HW throttling like here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/8/1791
>
> EAS is involved but not IPA

Thank you Vincent for pointing to Thara's patches. Indeed, this is a
good example. We will have to provide similar for our SCMI perf
notifications - these are the plans that I've mentioned. In both
new examples, the IPA (or other governors) won't be even involved.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-16 22:23    [W:0.050 / U:2.852 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site