Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Jun 2021 12:04:03 +0200 | From | Oleksij Rempel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] net: dsa: dsa_slave_phy_connect(): extend phy's flags with port specific phy flags |
| |
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 06:30:36AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > This patch extends the flags of the phy that's being connected with the > > port specific flags of the switch port. > > > > This is needed to handle a port specific erratum of the KSZ8873 switch, > > which is added in a later patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> > > --- > > drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 2 +- > > net/dsa/slave.c | 4 ++++ > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c > > index 96d8e88b4e46..167c2277814f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c > > @@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ static int phylink_attach_phy(struct phylink *pl, struct phy_device *phy, > > if (pl->phydev) > > return -EBUSY; > > > > - return phy_attach_direct(pl->netdev, phy, 0, interface); > > + return phy_attach_direct(pl->netdev, phy, phy->dev_flags, interface); > > I don't think this has any benefit. phy_attach_direct() does this > internally: > > phydev->dev_flags |= flags; > > which means the above change is effectively doing: > > phydev->dev_flags |= phydev->dev_flags; > > So, are you sure you need this?
Ah, good point. Back for two years, phy_attach_direct() was doing phydev->dev_flags = flags;
I didn't noticed this change.
Regards, Oleksij -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
| |