Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:07:46 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 04/11] x86/x86: Add is_tdx_guest() interface |
| |
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 02:01:41PM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote: > Is it alright to use vendor name in prot_guest_has() flag? I thought > we want to keep them generic.
Sure but keeping them only generic doesn't work in cases like this.
And just like you have:
+/* Protected Guest Feature Flags (leave 0-0xff for arch specific flags) */
there could be ranges for vendor-specific flags.
Intel at 200-2ff AMD at 300-3ff
which is 256 per vendor, so should be enough. :)
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
| |