[lkml]   [2021]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] iio: core: return ENODEV if ioctl is unknown
On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 12:18 PM Jonathan Cameron <> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 May 2021 20:21:08 +0200
> Linus Walleij <> wrote:

> > Unless you really like to base your work on Gregs tree for
> > some reason or other, that is.
> Definitely appreciate Greg's help (and patience), but no
> particularly strong reason to waste his time dealing with my
> mess ups. Hopefully they'll reduce now IIO trees are going directly
> into linux-next though.

I'd suggest to move to sending pulls to Torvalds directly
for IIO to cut the intermediary staging tree step, since
now the subsystem is pretty large and see a bunch of
frequent fixes that need an express path to Torvalds.

Pushing through Greg per se isn't really the problem,
I think the problem is that IIO is going through the
staging tree which (I guess) isn't a high priority activity
and not expected to carry any serious critical fixes and
I guess this can cause lags.

Maybe Greg has some other branch to take in IIO
fixes and for-next but I don't really see the point.

The IIO left in the staging tree is just regular staging
business at this point, the main IIO is much more

Linus 2: would pulling the IIO tree directly work for
you if Jonathan makes up his mind in favor for that?

Linus Walleij

 \ /
  Last update: 2021-05-09 17:31    [W:0.084 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site