Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 May 2021 19:08:03 +0000 | From | Dennis Zhou <> | Subject | Re: [percpu] ace7e70901: aim9.sync_disk_rw.ops_per_sec -2.3% regression |
| |
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 10:52:22AM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote: > On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 11:06:06AM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote: > > hi Roman, > > > > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 12:54:59AM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > Ping > > > > sorry for late. > > > > the new patch makes the performance a little better but still has > > 1.9% regression comparing to > > f183324133 ("percpu: implement partial chunk depopulation") > > Hi Oliver! > > Thank you for testing it! > > Btw, can you, please, confirm that the regression is coming specifically > from ace7e70901 ("percpu: use reclaim threshold instead of running for every page")? > I do see *some* regression in my setup, but the data is very noisy, so I'm not sure > I can confirm it. > > Thanks!
Thanks Oliver and Roman. If this is the case, I'll drop the final patch and just merge up to f183324133 ("percpu: implement partial chunk depopulation") into for-next as this is v5.14 anyway.
Oliver, is there a way to trigger the kernel test robot for a specific test?
Thanks, Dennis
| |