Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 May 2021 10:49:23 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] perf header: Support HYBRID_TOPOLOGY feature |
| |
Em Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:37:34PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:28:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:56:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 03:46:01PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote: > > > > It would be useful to let user know the hybrid topology. > > > > Adding HYBRID_TOPOLOGY feature in header to indicate the > > > > core cpus and the atom cpus. > > > > > > With this patch, > > > > > > For the perf.data generated on hybrid platform, > > > > reports the hybrid cpu list. > > > > > > root@otcpl-adl-s-2:~# perf report --header-only -I > > > > ... > > > > # cpu_core cpu list : 0-15 > > > > # cpu_atom cpu list : 16-23 > > > > > hum, should we print 'hybrid:' or something to make > > > sure its not confused with something else? like > > > > > # hybrid cpu_core cpu list : 0-15 > > > # hybrid cpu_atom cpu list : 16-23 > > > > But this _core/_atom already got to be enough? I disagreed with that > > naming, but neverthless having one or the other present in an output is > > a clear mark of this hybrid topology. > > > > I.e having that extra hybrid string that wouldn't add information to the > > output. > > sure when you know that cpu_core/cpu_atom are hybrid pmus ;-) > and I guess other arch will come with other names
Yeah, its too Intel centric, I thought they would come up with cpu_big/cpu_little and map it to core/atom on Intel and whatever other BIG/little arches come up with.
Perhaps:
root@otcpl-adl-s-2:~# perf report --header-only -I ... # hybrid cpu system: # cpu_core cpu list : 0-15 # cpu_atom cpu list : 16-23
?
- Arnaldo
| |