lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 1/2] perf header: Support HYBRID_TOPOLOGY feature
Em Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:37:34PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:28:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:56:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 03:46:01PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> > > > It would be useful to let user know the hybrid topology.
> > > > Adding HYBRID_TOPOLOGY feature in header to indicate the
> > > > core cpus and the atom cpus.
> >
> > > > With this patch,
> >
> > > > For the perf.data generated on hybrid platform,
> > > > reports the hybrid cpu list.
> >
> > > > root@otcpl-adl-s-2:~# perf report --header-only -I
> > > > ...
> > > > # cpu_core cpu list : 0-15
> > > > # cpu_atom cpu list : 16-23
> >
> > > hum, should we print 'hybrid:' or something to make
> > > sure its not confused with something else? like
> >
> > > # hybrid cpu_core cpu list : 0-15
> > > # hybrid cpu_atom cpu list : 16-23
> >
> > But this _core/_atom already got to be enough? I disagreed with that
> > naming, but neverthless having one or the other present in an output is
> > a clear mark of this hybrid topology.
> >
> > I.e having that extra hybrid string that wouldn't add information to the
> > output.
>
> sure when you know that cpu_core/cpu_atom are hybrid pmus ;-)
> and I guess other arch will come with other names

Yeah, its too Intel centric, I thought they would come up with
cpu_big/cpu_little and map it to core/atom on Intel and whatever other
BIG/little arches come up with.

Perhaps:

root@otcpl-adl-s-2:~# perf report --header-only -I
...
# hybrid cpu system:
# cpu_core cpu list : 0-15
# cpu_atom cpu list : 16-23

?

- Arnaldo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-05-05 15:50    [W:0.041 / U:1.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site