Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 May 2021 22:45:22 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Yet another way to mark upstream commits was Re: [PATCH 5.10 13/29] swiotlb: add a IO_TLB_SIZE define |
| |
Hi!
> From: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com> > > commit: b5d7ccb7aac3895c2138fe0980a109116ce15eff
This is 5th variant of marking upstream commits, and I need to update my scripts again.
Could we please put this into Signed-off area, where it belongs, so it is easy to see who touched the patch for mainline, and stop this creativity?
> Add a new IO_TLB_SIZE define instead open coding it using > IO_TLB_SHIFT all over. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > Acked-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com> > Tested-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
I'd like to see
Upstream: b5d7ccb7aac3895c2138fe0980a109116ce15eff
here. Probably. Note that it has additional advantage that you can easily marked who Acked/Tested the patch for mainline, and who tested it in the stable context.
> Signed-off-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Best regards, Pavel -- http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |