lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectYet another way to mark upstream commits was Re: [PATCH 5.10 13/29] swiotlb: add a IO_TLB_SIZE define
Hi!

> From: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>
>
> commit: b5d7ccb7aac3895c2138fe0980a109116ce15eff

This is 5th variant of marking upstream commits, and I need to update
my scripts again.

Could we please put this into Signed-off area, where it belongs, so it
is easy to see who touched the patch for mainline, and stop this
creativity?

> Add a new IO_TLB_SIZE define instead open coding it using
> IO_TLB_SHIFT all over.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Acked-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>
> Tested-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>

I'd like to see

Upstream: b5d7ccb7aac3895c2138fe0980a109116ce15eff

here. Probably. Note that it has additional advantage that you can
easily marked who Acked/Tested the patch for mainline, and who tested
it in the stable context.

> Signed-off-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Best regards,
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-05-05 22:45    [W:0.350 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site