Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: nVMX: Introduce nested_evmcs_is_used() | From | Paolo Bonzini <> | Date | Mon, 24 May 2021 16:18:21 +0200 |
| |
On 24/05/21 16:09, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > You mean we'll be using: > > "hv_evmcs_ptr == 0" meaning "no evmcs" (like now) > "hv_evmcs_ptr == -1" meaing "evmcs not yet mapped" (and > nested_evmcs_is_used() will check for both '0' and '-1') > "hv_evmcs_ptr == anything else" - eVMCS mapped.
I was thinking of:
hv_evmcs_ptr == -1 meaning no evmcs
hv_evmcs == NULL meaning "evmcs not yet mapped" (I think)
hv_evmcs != NULL meaning "evmcs mapped".
As usual with my suggestions, I'm not sure if this makes sense :) but if it does, the code should be nicer.
Paolo
| |