lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
    On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:47:13PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
    > On 5/21/21 12:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

    > > Like I say we may come up with some use for the flag in error cases in
    > > future so I'm not opposed to keeping the accounting there.

    > So, should I leave it the way it is now? Or should I not set reliable = false
    > for errors? Which one do you prefer?

    > Josh,

    > Are you OK with not flagging reliable = false for errors in unwind_frame()?

    I think it's fine to leave it as it is.
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2021-05-21 19:55    [W:2.330 / U:0.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site