Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 May 2021 18:53:18 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder |
| |
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:47:13PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote: > On 5/21/21 12:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Like I say we may come up with some use for the flag in error cases in > > future so I'm not opposed to keeping the accounting there.
> So, should I leave it the way it is now? Or should I not set reliable = false > for errors? Which one do you prefer?
> Josh,
> Are you OK with not flagging reliable = false for errors in unwind_frame()?
I think it's fine to leave it as it is. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |