lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/15] fs: gfs2: glock: Fix some deficient kernel-doc headers and demote non-conformant ones
On Fri, 21 May 2021, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:

> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:00 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> >
> > fs/gfs2/glock.c:365: warning: Function parameter or member 'gl' not described in 'do_error'
> > fs/gfs2/glock.c:365: warning: Function parameter or member 'ret' not described in 'do_error'
> > fs/gfs2/glock.c:461: warning: Function parameter or member 'new_state' not described in 'state_change'
> > fs/gfs2/glock.c:1277: warning: Function parameter or member 'delay' not described in 'handle_callback'
> > fs/gfs2/glock.c:1277: warning: Function parameter or member 'remote' not described in 'handle_callback'
> > fs/gfs2/glock.c:1578: warning: Function parameter or member 'p' not described in 'nq_m_sync'
> > fs/gfs2/glock.c:1993: warning: Excess function parameter 'wait' description in 'gfs2_gl_hash_clear'
>
> What's that? Those warnings don't exist in mainline, and the two
> warnings we have in mainline are fixed in for-next:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gfs2/linux-gfs2.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=75069590915f2

Thanks for the heads-up Andreas.

This is a rebased set that was authored last cycle.

It's great that someone has been through and fixed these already.

Tell me, is that just the case for this patch, or the whole set?

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-05-21 08:58    [W:0.059 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site