Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Douglas Anderson <> | Subject | [PATCH 2/2] nvmem: qfprom: Improve the comment about regulator setting | Date | Fri, 21 May 2021 14:00:58 -0700 |
| |
In review feedback Joe Perches found the existing comment confusing. Let's use something based on the wording proposed by Joe.
Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> ---
drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c index 1ba666bcb900..81fbad5e939d 100644 --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c @@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv, } /* - * Hardware requires a min voltage for fuse blowing; this may be - * a rail shared do don't specify a max--regulator constraints - * will handle. + * Hardware requires a minimum voltage for fuse blowing. + * This may be a shared rail so don't specify a maximum. + * Regulator constraints will cap to the actual maximum. */ ret = regulator_set_voltage(priv->vcc, qfprom_blow_uV, INT_MAX); if (ret) { -- 2.31.1.818.g46aad6cb9e-goog
| |