Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC v2 27/32] x86/tdx: Exclude Shared bit from __PHYSICAL_MASK | From | Dave Hansen <> | Date | Thu, 20 May 2021 14:23:27 -0700 |
| |
On 5/20/21 2:18 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > I understand the desire to have a unique prefix, but tdg is is _too_ close to > tdx. I don't want to spend the next N years wondering if tdg is a typo or intended.
Sathya has even mis-typed "tdx" instead of "tdg" this in his own changelogs up to this point. That massively weakens the argument that "tdg" is a good idea.
| |