lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH net v8 1/3] net: sched: fix packet stuck problem for lockless qdisc
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 4:39 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 May 2021 16:36:16 -0700 Cong Wang wrote:
> > > @@ -176,8 +202,15 @@ static inline bool qdisc_run_begin(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
> > > static inline void qdisc_run_end(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
> > > {
> > > write_seqcount_end(&qdisc->running);
> > > - if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK)
> > > + if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK) {
> > > spin_unlock(&qdisc->seqlock);
> > > +
> > > + if (unlikely(test_bit(__QDISC_STATE_MISSED,
> > > + &qdisc->state))) {
> > > + clear_bit(__QDISC_STATE_MISSED, &qdisc->state);
> >
> > We have test_and_clear_bit() which is atomic, test_bit()+clear_bit()
> > is not.
>
> It doesn't have to be atomic, right? I asked to split the test because
> test_and_clear is a locked op on x86, test by itself is not.

It depends on whether you expect the code under the true condition
to run once or multiple times, something like:

if (test_bit()) {
clear_bit();
// this code may run multiple times
}

With the atomic test_and_clear_bit(), it only runs once:

if (test_and_clear_bit()) {
// this code runs once
}

This is why __netif_schedule() uses test_and_set_bit() instead of
test_bit()+set_bit().

Thanks.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-05-15 01:58    [W:0.043 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site