Messages in this thread | | | From | Doug Smythies <> | Date | Fri, 14 May 2021 08:31:25 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add Icelake servers support in no-HWP mode |
| |
Hi All,
Can I on-board to this patch or do you want me to submit another? I want to add COMETLAKE (tested), as below:
... Doug
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 6:21 AM Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz> wrote: > > Users may disable HWP in firmware, in which case intel_pstate wouldn't load > unless the CPU model is explicitly supported. > > Add ICELAKE_X to the list of CPUs that can register intel_pstate while not > advertising the HWP capability. Without this change, an ICELAKE_X in no-HWP > mode could only use the acpi_cpufreq frequency scaling driver. > > See also commit d8de7a44e11f ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add Skylake servers > support"). > > Signed-off-by: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz> > --- > This replaces https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210513075930.22657-1-ggherdovich@suse.cz > > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > index f0401064d7aa..28c9733e0dce 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > @@ -2087,6 +2087,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pstate_cpu_ids[] = { > X86_MATCH(ATOM_GOLDMONT, core_funcs), > X86_MATCH(ATOM_GOLDMONT_PLUS, core_funcs), > X86_MATCH(SKYLAKE_X, core_funcs), > + X86_MATCH(ICELAKE_X, core_funcs), + X86_MATCH(COMETLAKE, core_funcs), > {} > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_pstate_cpu_ids); > -- > 2.26.2 >
| |