lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: x86: Invoke hypercall when page encryption status is changed
From
Date
On 14/05/21 09:33, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Ok, so explain to me how this looks from the user standpoint: she starts
> migrating the guest, it fails to lookup an address, there's nothing
> saying where it failed but the guest crashed.
>
> Do you think this is user-friendly?

Ok, so explain to me how this looks from the submitter standpoint: he
reads your review of his patch, he acknowledges your point with "Yes, it
makes sense to signal it with a WARN or so", and still is treated as shit.

Do you think this is friendly?

Paolo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-05-14 10:04    [W:0.138 / U:0.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site