Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 May 2021 15:26:05 -0400 | From | Sasha Levin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/244] 5.4.119-rc1 review |
| |
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 06:02:37PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >On Wed, 12 May 2021 18:00:16 +0100, >Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote: >> I made this change to get it to build: >> >> $ git diff >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> index dd03d5e01a94..32564b017ba0 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, >> int cpu) {} >> static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} >> >> static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {} >> +static inline void kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} >> static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} >> static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} >> static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} >> >> which matches the stub for kvm_arm_init_debug(). I can spin a patch >> out of it and send it for 5.4 and 4.19. Marc, what do you think? > >Ideally, we'd drop the patch in its current form from 5.4 and 4.19, >and send an updated patch with this hunk to fix the 32bit build.
Yes please. I've dropped it from 5.4 and 4.19 and we can queue up a fixed backport for the next round of releases.
-- Thanks, Sasha
| |