lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] newidle_balance() PREEMPT_RT latency mitigations
From
Date
On Sat, 2021-05-01 at 17:03 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 09:12 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 01:28, Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > These patches mitigate latency caused by newidle_balance() on large
> > > systems when PREEMPT_RT is enabled, by enabling interrupts when the lock
> > > is dropped, and exiting early at various points if an RT task is
> > > runnable
> > > on the current CPU.
> > >
> > > On a system with 128 CPUs, these patches dropped latency (as measured by
> > > a 12 hour rteval run) from 1045us to 317us (when applied to
> > > 5.12.0-rc3-rt3).
> >
> > The patch below has been queued for v5.13 and removed the update of
> > blocked load what seemed to be the major reason for long preempt/irq
> > off during newly idle balance:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210224133007.28644-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org/
> >
> > I would be curious to see how it impacts your cases
>
> I still get 1000+ ms latencies with those patches applied.

If NEWIDLE balancing migrates one task, how does that manage to consume
a full *millisecond*, and why would that only be a problem for RT?

-Mike

(rt tasks don't play !rt balancer here, if CPU goes idle, tough titty)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-05-02 05:27    [W:0.068 / U:0.576 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site