Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 Apr 2021 13:12:12 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: static_branch/jump_label vs branch merging |
| |
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 11:57:22AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 18:53, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > Is there *any* way in which we can have the compiler recognise that the > > asm_goto only depends on its arguments and have it merge the branches > > itself? > > > > I do realize that asm-goto being volatile this is a fairly huge ask, but > > I figured I should at least raise the issue, if only to raise awareness. > > > > Wouldn't that require the compiler to interpret the contents of the asm() block?
Yeah, this is more or less asking for ponies :-) One option would be some annotation that conveys the desired semantics without it having to untangle the mess in the asm block.
The thing the compiler needs to know is that the branch is constant for any @key, and hence allow the obvious optimizations. I'm not sure if this is something compiler folks would be even willing to consider, but I figured asking never hurts.
| |