Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: improve --stdio mode | From | Martin Liška <> | Date | Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:08:30 +0200 |
| |
On 4/7/21 10:25 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:30:46PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: >> Em Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:24:00AM +0100, Martin Liška escreveu: >>> On 2/23/21 8:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> Sure. But I think the current format provides quite broken visual layout: >>> >>> 0.00 : 405ef1: inc %r15 >>> 0.01 : 405ef4: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b3(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b0> >>> eff.c:1811 0.67 : 405efd: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b2(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b8> >>> : TA + tmpsd * (TB + >>> >>> vs. >>> >>> 0.00 : 405ef1: inc %r15 >>> 0.01 : 405ef4: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b3(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b0> >>> 0.67 : 405efd: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b2(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b8> // eff.c:1811 >>> : 1810 TA + tmpsd * (TB + >>> >>> I bet also the current users of --stdio mode would benefit from it. >>> What do you think? > >> Agreed, I tried applying but it bitrotted, it seems :-\ > > I refreshed it, please check.
Thanks! I've just tested the patch on top of acme/perf/core and it works as was planned. I'm attaching 2 perf annotate snippets (perf annotate --stdio -l --stdio-color=always) before and after the revision:
https://splichal.eu/tmp/perf-before.html https://splichal.eu/tmp/perf-after.html
I hope it nicely describes that it's an improvement.
Cheers, Martin
> > - Arnaldo > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c > index 18eee25b4976bea8..abe1499a91645375 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c > @@ -1368,7 +1368,6 @@ annotation_line__print(struct annotation_line *al, struct symbol *sym, u64 start > { > struct disasm_line *dl = container_of(al, struct disasm_line, al); > static const char *prev_line; > - static const char *prev_color; > > if (al->offset != -1) { > double max_percent = 0.0; > @@ -1407,20 +1406,6 @@ annotation_line__print(struct annotation_line *al, struct symbol *sym, u64 start > > color = get_percent_color(max_percent); > > - /* > - * Also color the filename and line if needed, with > - * the same color than the percentage. Don't print it > - * twice for close colored addr with the same filename:line > - */ > - if (al->path) { > - if (!prev_line || strcmp(prev_line, al->path) > - || color != prev_color) { > - color_fprintf(stdout, color, " %s", al->path); > - prev_line = al->path; > - prev_color = color; > - } > - } > - > for (i = 0; i < nr_percent; i++) { > struct annotation_data *data = &al->data[i]; > double percent; > @@ -1441,6 +1426,19 @@ annotation_line__print(struct annotation_line *al, struct symbol *sym, u64 start > printf(" : "); > > disasm_line__print(dl, start, addr_fmt_width); > + > + /* > + * Also color the filename and line if needed, with > + * the same color than the percentage. Don't print it > + * twice for close colored addr with the same filename:line > + */ > + if (al->path) { > + if (!prev_line || strcmp(prev_line, al->path)) { > + color_fprintf(stdout, color, " // %s", al->path); > + prev_line = al->path; > + } > + } > + > printf("\n"); > } else if (max_lines && printed >= max_lines) > return 1; > @@ -1456,7 +1454,7 @@ annotation_line__print(struct annotation_line *al, struct symbol *sym, u64 start > if (!*al->line) > printf(" %*s:\n", width, " "); > else > - printf(" %*s: %*s %s\n", width, " ", addr_fmt_width, " ", al->line); > + printf(" %*s: %-*d %s\n", width, " ", addr_fmt_width, al->line_nr, al->line); > } > > return 0; >
| |