lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: spi: Convert cadence-quadspi.txt to cadence-quadspi.yaml
On 01/04/21 03:13PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 01:09:32AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>
> > I did take a look by running git log on
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/ and there is no single style
> > being used. Using "dt-bindings: spi:" is a popular choice. Some other
> > commits just use "spi:". And then some use "spi: dt-bindings:". The last
> > commit to touch cadence-quadspi.txt (fcebca39938f) used the prefix
> > "dt-bindings: spi:".
>
> Yes, lots of people pick unfortunate subject lines for DT patches - that
> doesn't mean it's good. I'm looking to see spi: same as for all other
> SPI patches.

All right. "spi: dt-bindings:" it is from now on.

>
> > So on the prefix front I think the subject is good enough. Of course, if
> > you have any other preference then it can be re-worded but let's first
> > be clear on what the expectation is. And then let's make sure to apply
> > it to all future patches uniformly. This way future contributors won't
> > have to take a guess on what the expected prefix is.
>
> I do edit some percentage of patches, but some do slip through for
> various reasons. There's also some things that just get completely
> missed, especially if there isn't also a code patch nearby.
>
> > Apart from the prefix is there anything else to improve? IMHO the
> > subject is good enough but I'm open to suggestions.
>
> There was the thing with constraints.

Will send a follow up patch to add the constraints that Vignesh
suggested.

--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-05 10:34    [W:0.050 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site