Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:13:25 +0200 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 169/190] Revert "atl1e: checking the status of atl1e_write_phy_reg" |
| |
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 03:00:44PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This reverts commit ff07d48d7bc0974d4f96a85a4df14564fb09f1ef. > > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known > malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota). > > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if > they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the > codebase. > > Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu> > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c > index ff9f96de74b8..85f9cb769e30 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c > @@ -455,9 +455,7 @@ static void atl1e_mdio_write(struct net_device *netdev, int phy_id, > { > struct atl1e_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); > > - if (atl1e_write_phy_reg(&adapter->hw, > - reg_num & MDIO_REG_ADDR_MASK, val)) > - netdev_err(netdev, "write phy register failed\n"); > + atl1e_write_phy_reg(&adapter->hw, reg_num & MDIO_REG_ADDR_MASK, val); > } > > static int atl1e_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, > -- > 2.31.1 >
The original change here is a mess, what is a user supposed to do if this call fails? I will revert it and properly pass the error value up to the callers, as that is the correct thing to do here, not paper over the issue with a commit message that claims this change "fixes" anything.
thanks,
greg k-h
| |