Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:02:36 -0400 | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | [PATCH v4] sched,fair: Skip newidle_balance if a wakeup is pending |
| |
The try_to_wake_up function has an optimization where it can queue a task for wakeup on its previous CPU, if the task is still in the middle of going to sleep inside schedule().
Once schedule() re-enables IRQs, the task will be woken up with an IPI, and placed back on the runqueue.
If we have such a wakeup pending, there is no need to search other CPUs for runnable tasks. Just skip (or bail out early from) newidle balancing, and run the just woken up task.
For a memcache like workload test, this reduces total CPU use by about 2%, proportionally split between user and system time, and p99 and p95 application response time by 10% on average. The schedstats run_delay number shows a similar improvement.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 69680158963f..6a18688a37f8 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -10594,6 +10594,14 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf) u64 curr_cost = 0; update_misfit_status(NULL, this_rq); + + /* + * There is a task waiting to run. No need to search for one. + * Return 0; the task will be enqueued when switching to idle. + */ + if (this_rq->ttwu_pending) + return 0; + /* * We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such that we * measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time. @@ -10661,7 +10669,8 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf) * Stop searching for tasks to pull if there are * now runnable tasks on this rq. */ - if (pulled_task || this_rq->nr_running > 0) + if (pulled_task || this_rq->nr_running > 0 || + this_rq->ttwu_pending) break; } rcu_read_unlock(); -- 2.25.4
| |