lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rtc: bd70528: fix BD71815 watchdog dependency
From
Date
On 4/22/21 6:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> The added Kconfig dependency is slightly incorrect, which can
> lead to a link failure when the watchdog is a loadable module:
>
> arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.o: in function `bd70528_set_rtc_based_timers':
> rtc-bd70528.c:(.text+0x6cc): undefined reference to `bd70528_wdt_set'
> arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.o: in function `bd70528_set_time':
> rtc-bd70528.c:(.text+0xaa0): undefined reference to `bd70528_wdt_lock'
> arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: rtc-bd70528.c:(.text+0xab8): undefined reference to `bd70528_wdt_unlock'
> arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.o: in function `bd70528_alm_enable':
> rtc-bd70528.c:(.text+0xfc0): undefined reference to `bd70528_wdt_lock'
> arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: rtc-bd70528.c:(.text+0x1030): undefined reference to `bd70528_wdt_unlock'
>
> The problem is that it allows to be built-in if any of the other
> drivers are built-in, even when the watchdog is a loadable module.
>
> Rework this so that having the watchdog as a loadable module always
> forces the rtc to be a module as well instead of built-in, regardless
> of the other ones.
>
> Fixes: c56dc069f268 ("rtc: bd70528: Support RTC on ROHM BD71815")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> index d8c13fded164..91cc106e2bf6 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> @@ -502,7 +502,8 @@ config RTC_DRV_M41T80_WDT
>
> config RTC_DRV_BD70528
> tristate "ROHM BD70528, BD71815 and BD71828 PMIC RTC"
> - depends on MFD_ROHM_BD71828 || MFD_ROHM_BD70528 && (BD70528_WATCHDOG || !BD70528_WATCHDOG)
> + depends on MFD_ROHM_BD71828 || MFD_ROHM_BD70528 || BD70528_WATCHDOG

Is the "|| BD70528_WATCHDOG" above correct ? Seems odd to me, since
it makes the depend statement true even if neither MFD_ROHM_BD71828
nor MFD_ROHM_BD70528 is enabled.

I think the condition needs to be something like
depends on (MFD_ROHM_BD71828 || MFD_ROHM_BD70528) && (BD70528_WATCHDOG || !BD70528_WATCHDOG)
or, in two lines,
depends on MFD_ROHM_BD71828 || MFD_ROHM_BD70528
depends on BD70528_WATCHDOG || !BD70528_WATCHDOG

Thanks,
Guenter

> + depends on BD70528_WATCHDOG || !BD70528_WATCHDOG
> help
> If you say Y here you will get support for the RTC
> block on ROHM BD70528, BD71815 and BD71828 Power Management IC.
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-22 16:23    [W:0.043 / U:1.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site