lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [v5.4 stable] arm: stm32: Regression observed on "no-map" reserved memory region
On Wednesday 21 Apr 2021 at 07:33:52 (-0700), Florian Fainelli wrote:
> It is not, otherwise I would have noticed earlier, can you try the same
> thing that happens on my platform with a reserved region (without
> no-map) adjacent to a reserved region with 'no-map'?

I just tried, but still no luck. FTR, I tried to reproduce your setup
with the following DT:

memory@40000000 {
reg = <0x00 0x40000000 0x01 0x00>;
device_type = "memory";
};

reserved-memory {
#address-cells = <2>;
#size-cells = <2>;
ranges;

foo@fdfff000{
reg = <0x00 0xfdfff000 0x0 0x1000>;
};
bar@fe000000{
reg = <0x00 0xfe000000 0x0 0x2000000>;
no-map;
};
};

And with 5.4.102 and 5.10.31 I get the following in /proc/iomem

<...>
40000000-fdffffff : System RAM
40080000-412cffff : Kernel code
412d0000-417affff : reserved
417b0000-419f8fff : Kernel data
48000000-48008fff : reserved
f7c00000-fdbfffff : reserved
fdfff000-fdffffff : reserved
fe000000-ffffffff : reserved
100000000-13fffffff : System RAM
<...>

which looks about right. I'll keep trying a few other things.

Thanks,
Quentin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-22 14:59    [W:0.089 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site