Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:37:36 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add Microchip PolarFire Soc Support | From | Palmer Dabbelt <> |
| |
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:33:39 PDT (-0700), atishp@atishpatra.org wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 8:26 PM Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:17 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, 03 Mar 2021 12:02:48 PST (-0800), Atish Patra wrote: >> > > This series adds minimal support for Microchip Polar Fire Soc Icicle kit. >> > > It is rebased on v5.12-rc1 and depends on clock support. >> > > Only MMC and ethernet drivers are enabled via this series. >> > > The idea here is to add the foundational patches so that other drivers >> > > can be added to on top of this. The device tree may change based on >> > > feedback on bindings of individual driver support patches. >> > > >> > > This series has been tested on Qemu and Polar Fire Soc Icicle kit. >> > > It depends on the updated clock-series[2] and macb fix[3]. >> > > The series is also tested by Lewis from Microchip. >> > > >> > > The series can also be found at. >> > > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/polarfire_support_upstream_v4 >> > > >> > > [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-10/msg08582.html >> > > [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-clk/msg54579.html >> > > >> > > Changes from v3->v4: >> > > 1. Fixed few DT specific issues. >> > > 2. Rebased on top of new clock driver. >> > > 3. SD card functionality is verified. >> > > >> > > Changes from v2->v3: >> > > 1. Fixed a typo in dt binding. >> > > 2. Included MAINTAINERS entry for PolarFire SoC. >> > > 3. Improved the dts file by using lowercase clock names and keeping phy >> > > details in board specific dts file. >> > > >> > > Changes from v1->v2: >> > > 1. Modified the DT to match the device tree in U-Boot. >> > > 2. Added both eMMC & SDcard entries in DT. However, SD card is only enabled >> > > as it allows larger storage option for linux distros. >> > > >> > > Atish Patra (4): >> > > RISC-V: Add Microchip PolarFire SoC kconfig option >> > > dt-bindings: riscv: microchip: Add YAML documentation for the >> > > PolarFire SoC >> > > RISC-V: Initial DTS for Microchip ICICLE board >> > > RISC-V: Enable Microchip PolarFire ICICLE SoC >> > > >> > > Conor Dooley (1): >> > > MAINTAINERS: add microchip polarfire soc support >> > > >> > > .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml | 27 ++ >> > > MAINTAINERS | 8 + >> > > arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs | 7 + >> > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + >> > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile | 2 + >> > > .../microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts | 72 ++++ >> > > .../boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi | 329 ++++++++++++++++++ >> > > arch/riscv/configs/defconfig | 4 + >> > > 8 files changed, 450 insertions(+) >> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml >> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile >> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts >> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi >> > >> > I had this left in my inbox waiting for either some reviews to come in or a v2, >> > but I don't see any. Did I miss something? >> > >> Sorry for the late reply. I am on vacation until May. I think I saw >> all the patches have already been reviewed. >> Let me know if it is not the case. >> > I cross checked and all the patches are reviewed-by. > @palmer: Is it possible to take this series for 5.13 MW ?
I still don't see any reviews for the mailbox driver, did it just get lost on the way to me?
> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > linux-riscv mailing list >> > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org >> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Atish
| |