lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 000/190] Revertion of all of the umn.edu commits
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021, Kangjie Lu wrote:

> > Therefore I'd like to ask Kangjie Lu (who is CCed here) to consider
> > revising his statement in the attempted public clarification:
> >
> > "The experiment did not introduce any bug or bug-introducing
> > commit into
> > OSS."
> >
> > at [1] as it's clearly not true. Missing mutex unlock clearky is a bug
> > introduced by this experiment.
> >
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am so sorry for the concerns. I fully understand why the community is
> angry. Please allow me to have a very quick response, as Jiri requested. We
> will provide a detailed explanation later.

Thanks.

> These are two different projects. The one published at IEEE S&P 2021 has
> completely finished in November 2020.

What about 8a94644b440 then? It's from May 2020, it has been committed to
the tree, and it introduces a NULL pointer dereference on
kobject_init_and_add() failure.

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-21 17:10    [W:0.224 / U:0.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site