lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 059/190] Revert "RDMA/srpt: Remove unnecessary assertion in srpt_queue_response"
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:02:47AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:58:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This reverts commit 9f48db0d4a08624bb9ba847ea40c8abad753b396.
> >
> > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> > malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a
> > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> >
> > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> > they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this
> > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> > codebase.
> >
> > Cc: https
> > Cc: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@umn.edu>
> > Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> I think this one is fine

Sorry, I realize that is unclear. I mean I don't see a reason to
revert this patch.

Jason

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-21 16:06    [W:0.252 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site