Messages in this thread | | | From | "Gross, Mark" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v6 19/34] xlink-core: Add xlink core device tree bindings | Date | Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:08:26 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 2:33 PM > To: mgross@linux.intel.com; markgross@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de; bp@suse.de; > damien.lemoal@wdc.com; dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com; > gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; corbet@lwn.net; palmerdabbelt@google.com; > paul.walmsley@sifive.com; peng.fan@nxp.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; > shawnguo@kernel.org; jassisinghbrar@gmail.com > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Kelly, Seamus <seamus.kelly@intel.com>; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/34] xlink-core: Add xlink core device tree bindings > > On 2/12/21 2:22 PM, mgross@linux.intel.com wrote: > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) # Copyright (c) > > +Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. > > +%YAML 1.2 > > +--- > > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/misc/intel,keembay-xlink.yaml#" > > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#" > > + > > +title: Intel Keem Bay xlink > > Is there a specific reason this is dual licensed? If so, can you please include > information about the license choice in the next post's cover letter? > > If there is no specific reason for this contribution to be dual licensed, please make it > GPL-2.0 only. I will.
I'm just waiting on some testing before making the next post.
Thanks, --mark
| |