lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v6 19/34] xlink-core: Add xlink core device tree bindings
Date


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 2:33 PM
> To: mgross@linux.intel.com; markgross@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de; bp@suse.de;
> damien.lemoal@wdc.com; dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com;
> gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; corbet@lwn.net; palmerdabbelt@google.com;
> paul.walmsley@sifive.com; peng.fan@nxp.com; robh+dt@kernel.org;
> shawnguo@kernel.org; jassisinghbrar@gmail.com
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Kelly, Seamus <seamus.kelly@intel.com>;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/34] xlink-core: Add xlink core device tree bindings
>
> On 2/12/21 2:22 PM, mgross@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) # Copyright (c)
> > +Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/misc/intel,keembay-xlink.yaml#"
> > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"
> > +
> > +title: Intel Keem Bay xlink
>
> Is there a specific reason this is dual licensed? If so, can you please include
> information about the license choice in the next post's cover letter?
>
> If there is no specific reason for this contribution to be dual licensed, please make it
> GPL-2.0 only.
I will.

I'm just waiting on some testing before making the next post.

Thanks,
--mark
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-21 00:09    [W:0.129 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site