lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] extcon: maxim: Fix missing IRQF_ONESHOT as only threaded handler
From
Date


On 16/04/2021 16:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/04/2021 13:36, zhuguangqing83@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Guangqing Zhu <zhuguangqing83@gmail.com>
>>
>> Coccinelle noticed:
>> 1. drivers/extcon/extcon-max14577.c:699:8-33: ERROR: Threaded IRQ with
>> no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT
>> 2. drivers/extcon/extcon-max77693.c:1143:8-33: ERROR: Threaded IRQ with
>> no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT
>> 3. drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c:907:8-33: ERROR: Threaded IRQ with
>> no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT
>> 4. drivers/extcon/extcon-max8997.c:665:8-28: ERROR: Threaded IRQ with
>> no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guangqing Zhu <zhuguangqing83@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/extcon/extcon-max14577.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/extcon/extcon-max77693.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/extcon/extcon-max8997.c | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max14577.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max14577.c
>> index ace523924e58..af15a9e00ee9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max14577.c
>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max14577.c
>> @@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ static int max14577_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, virq, NULL,
>> max14577_muic_irq_handler,
>> - IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
>> + IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>
> The same with all other patches for IRQF_ONESHOT which are send recently:
> 1. On what board did you test it?

I didn't test it.

> 2. Is this just blind patch from Coccinelle without investigation
> whether it is needed (hint: it's not needed here, it does not use
> default primary handler).

I found the error notice from Coccinelle and I saw the code. Maybe
I'm mistaken, I think it's needed here. Because handler == NULL and
thread_fn != NULL, it use irq_default_primary_handler() in
request_threaded_irq().

> 3. If you think otherwise, please explain.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

Thanks for your review.

Best regards,
Guangqing Zhu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-18 16:42    [W:0.102 / U:0.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site