lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [syzbot] general protection fault in gadget_setup
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:21:12AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:59 PM Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 07:11:11PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > > Yes, this is possible:
> > > http://bit.do/syzbot#syzkaller-reproducers
> >
> > That's not really what I had in mind. I don't want to spend the time
> > and effort installing syskaller on my own system; I want to tell syzbot
> > to run a particular syzkaller program (the one that originally led to
> > this bug report) on a patched kernel.
> >
> > The syzbot instructions say that it can test bugs with reproducers. The
> > problem here is that there doesn't seem to be any way to tell it to use
> > a particular syzkaller program as a reproducer.
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> This makes sense and I've found an existing feature request:
> https://github.com/google/syzkaller/issues/1611
> I've added a reference to this thread there.

Great! Thank you.

Alan Stern

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-16 17:33    [W:0.103 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site