lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/7] stm class: Replace uuid_t with plain u8 uuid[16]
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:48:48AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:35 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:14:34PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> > >
> > > >> Using raw buffer APIs against uuid_t / guid_t.
> > > >
> > > > So you want to do that, or you do not want to do that? Totally
> > > > confused,
> > >
> > > My understanding is that:
> > > 1) generate_random_uuid() use is allegedly bad even though it's in their
> > > header,
> > > 2) poking directly at the byte array inside uuid_t is bad, even though,
> > > again, header.
> > >
> > > It is, indeed, not ideal.
> > >
> > > If agreeable, I'll update this patch to the below and respin the whole
> > > series.
> >
> > You are showing that Andy wrote this, when you are the one that did :(
>
> > Anyway, I've dropped this single patch from the series and applied the
> > rest. Feel free to send this patch as a stand-alone one once you have
> > the authorship issues sorted out.
>
> Internally it was proposed by me as well, so authorship is correct.

And I am supposed to know this how?

Come on people, you know better than this...

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-15 11:10    [W:0.048 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site