lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused variable ret in hal/sdio_halinit.c
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 02:57:35PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> fix following compiler warning issue:
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c:
> In function 'CardDisableRTL8723BSdio':
> >> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c:881:5:
> warning: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> 881 | u8 ret = _FAIL;
> | ^~~
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c
> index 2098384efe92..936181a73d73 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c
> @@ -878,10 +878,9 @@ static void CardDisableRTL8723BSdio(struct adapter *padapter)
> {
> u8 u1bTmp;
> u8 bMacPwrCtrlOn;
> - u8 ret = _FAIL;
>
> /* Run LPS WL RFOFF flow */
> - ret = HalPwrSeqCmdParsing(padapter, PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK, PWR_FAB_ALL_MSK, PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK, rtl8723B_enter_lps_flow);
> + HalPwrSeqCmdParsing(padapter, PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK, PWR_FAB_ALL_MSK, PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK, rtl8723B_enter_lps_flow);
>
> /* ==== Reset digital sequence ====== */
>
> @@ -909,9 +908,8 @@ static void CardDisableRTL8723BSdio(struct adapter *padapter)
> /* ==== Reset digital sequence end ====== */
>
> bMacPwrCtrlOn = false; /* Disable CMD53 R/W */
> - ret = false;
> rtw_hal_set_hwreg(padapter, HW_VAR_APFM_ON_MAC, &bMacPwrCtrlOn);
> - ret = HalPwrSeqCmdParsing(padapter, PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK, PWR_FAB_ALL_MSK, PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK, rtl8723B_card_disable_flow);
> + HalPwrSeqCmdParsing(padapter, PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK, PWR_FAB_ALL_MSK, PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK, rtl8723B_card_disable_flow);
> }

Why isn't the return value being checked and returned to the caller if
something goes wrong? Ignoring it feels wrong to me.

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-12 12:10    [W:0.094 / U:0.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site