Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:05:19 -0500 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: The killing of ideal_nops[] |
| |
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:58:17 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > AFAICT everything made in the past 10 years ends up using p6_nops. Is it > time to kill off ideal_nops[] and simplify life? >
Well, the one bug that was reported recently was due to a box that uses a different "ideal_nops" than p6_nops. Perhaps we should ask him if there's any noticeable difference between using p6_nops for every function than the ideal_nops that as found for that box.
-- Steve
| |