lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [External] : Re: [PATCH v2] mmc-utils: Add eMMC erase command support
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 23:36, <kimito.sakata@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/30/2021 6:39 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 17:45, Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> From: Kimito Sakata <kimito.sakata@oracle.com>
> >>
> >> we have been using this erase feature for a while, but it is
> >> still not merged into the upstream mmc-utils. Especially, for
> >> the customer, every time when they update the mmc-utils, they
> >> should re-install this patch again, let's try to make this
> >> erase command upstreamed in the mmc-utils.
> >>
> >> Co-developed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Kenneth Gibbons <kenny.gibbons@oracle.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Hi Ulf,
> >> Please help us review this mmc-utils patch, and if agree, it is
> >> possible to make it merged in the official mmc-utils.
> >>
> >> Changelog:
> >>
> >> V1--V2:
> >> 1. refactor Kimito's original patch
> >> 2. change to use MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD
> >> 3. add checkup if eMMC devie supports secure erase/trim
> >>
> >> ---
> >> mmc.c | 8 ++++
> >> mmc.h | 13 +++++-
> >> mmc_cmds.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> mmc_cmds.h | 1 +
> >> 4 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mmc.c b/mmc.c
> >> index 50c9c9e..cb29a65 100644
> >> --- a/mmc.c
> >> +++ b/mmc.c
> >> @@ -215,6 +215,14 @@ static struct Command commands[] = {
> >> "Run Field Firmware Update with <image name> on <device>.\n",
> >> NULL
> >> },
> >> + { do_erase, -4,
> >> + "erase", "<type> " "<start address> " "<end address> " "<device>\n"
> >> + "Send Erase CMD38 with specific argument to the <device>\n\n"
> >> + "NOTE!: This will delete all user data in the specified region of the device\n"
> >> + "<type> must be: legacy | discard | secure-erase | "
> >> + "secure-trim1 | secure-trim2 | trim \n",
> >> + NULL
> >> + },
> >> { 0, 0, 0, 0 }
> >> };
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mmc.h b/mmc.h
> >> index 648fb26..90b7fb5 100644
> >> --- a/mmc.h
> >> +++ b/mmc.h
> >> @@ -34,7 +34,15 @@
> >> #define MMC_SET_WRITE_PROT 28 /* ac [31:0] data addr R1b */
> >> #define MMC_CLEAR_WRITE_PROT 29 /* ac [31:0] data addr R1b */
> >> #define MMC_SEND_WRITE_PROT_TYPE 31 /* ac [31:0] data addr R1 */
> >> -
> >> +#define MMC_ERASE_GROUP_START 35 /* ac [31:0] data addr R1 */
> >> +#define MMC_ERASE_GROUP_END 36 /* ac [31:0] data addr R1 */
> >> +#define MMC_ERASE 38 /* ac [31] Secure request
> >> + [30:16] set to 0
> >> + [15] Force Garbage Collect request
> >> + [14:2] set to 0
> >> + [1] Discard Enable
> >> + [0] Identify Write Blocks for
> >> + Erase (or TRIM Enable) R1b */
> >> /*
> >> * EXT_CSD fields
> >> */
> >> @@ -61,6 +69,7 @@
> >> #define EXT_CSD_CACHE_SIZE_2 251
> >> #define EXT_CSD_CACHE_SIZE_1 250
> >> #define EXT_CSD_CACHE_SIZE_0 249
> >> +#define EXT_CSD_SEC_FEATURE_SUPPORT 231
> >> #define EXT_CSD_BOOT_INFO 228 /* R/W */
> >> #define EXT_CSD_HC_ERASE_GRP_SIZE 224
> >> #define EXT_CSD_HC_WP_GRP_SIZE 221
> >> @@ -177,6 +186,8 @@
> >> #define EXT_CSD_REV_V4_2 2
> >> #define EXT_CSD_REV_V4_1 1
> >> #define EXT_CSD_REV_V4_0 0
> >> +#define EXT_CSD_SEC_GB_CL_EN (1<<4)
> >> +#define EXT_CSD_SEC_ER_EN (1<<0)
> >>
> >>
> >> /* From kernel linux/mmc/core.h */
> >> diff --git a/mmc_cmds.c b/mmc_cmds.c
> >> index fb37189..17986e3 100644
> >> --- a/mmc_cmds.c
> >> +++ b/mmc_cmds.c
> >> @@ -2435,6 +2435,141 @@ int do_cache_dis(int nargs, char **argv)
> >> return do_cache_ctrl(0, nargs, argv);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static int erase(int dev_fd, __u32 argin, __u32 start, __u32 end)
> >> +{
> >> +#ifndef MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD
> > In kernel v4.4 we added the multi cmd support, which is quite some
> > time ago. So, I think it's time to drop these ifdef hackary from the
> > userland tool. At least, we shouldn't need it for new kinds of
> > features that we add.
> Ulf
> Do you want us to take out the MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD ifdef and resubmit?

Yes, please.

Moreover, we should probably also remove all the other #ifndef
MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD hacks that we currently have in the code. But that's
a separate patch.

> Kimito
>
> >
> >> + fprintf(stderr, "mmc-utils has been compiled without MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD"
> >> + " support, needed by erase.\n");
> >> + return -ENOTSUP;
> >> +#else
> >> + int ret = 0;
> >> + struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd *multi_cmd;
> >> +
> > [...]

Kind regards
Uffe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-31 11:32    [W:0.069 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site