Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:33:25 +0200 | From | Petr Mladek <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] printk: rename vprintk_func to vprintk |
| |
On Tue 2021-03-30 14:59:31, John Ogness wrote: > On 2021-03-30, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote: > > On Tue 2021-03-23 15:42:01, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > >> The printk code is already hard enough to understand. Remove an > >> unnecessary indirection by renaming vprintk_func to vprintk (adding > >> the asmlinkage annotation), and removing the vprintk definition from > >> printk.c. That way, printk is implemented in terms of vprintk as one > >> would expect, and there's no "vprintk_func, what's that? Some function > >> pointer that gets set where?" > >> > >> The declaration of vprintk in linux/printk.h already has the > >> __printf(1,0) attribute, there's no point repeating that with the > >> definition - it's for diagnostics in callers. > >> > >> linux/printk.h already contains a static inline {return 0;} definition > >> of vprintk when !CONFIG_PRINTK. > >> > >> Since the corresponding stub definition of vprintk_func was not marked > >> "static inline", any translation unit including internal.h would get a > >> definition of vprintk_func - it just so happens that for > >> !CONFIG_PRINTK, there is precisely one such TU, namely printk.c. Had > >> there been more, it would be a link error; now it's just a silly waste > >> of a few bytes of .text, which one must assume are rather precious to > >> anyone disabling PRINTK. > >> > >> $ objdump -dr kernel/printk/printk.o > >> 00000330 <vprintk_func>: > >> 330: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax > >> 332: c3 ret > >> 333: 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%esi,%eiz,1),%esi > >> 33a: 8d b6 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%esi),%esi > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> > > > > Nice clean up! > > > > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> > > > > John, > > > > it conflicts with the patchset removing printk safe buffers[1]. > > Would you prefer to queue this into the patchset? > > Or should I push it into printk/linux.git, printk-rework and you would > > base v2 on top of it? > > Please push it to printk-rework. I will base my v2 on top of it.
The patch is committed in printk/linux.git, branch printk-rework. It is queued for 5.13.
Best Regards, Petr
| |