Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:22:54 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: Enabling pmbus power control |
| |
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 03:34:16AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> (and I don't know if the userspace consumer code is appropriate - you > might want to check with the regulator maintainer on that).
It's not, you should never see this in a production system.
> > first attempt at this ran into problems with all the > > reg-userspace-consumer instances getting attached to the first > > regulator device, I think due to all of the regulators ending up under > > the same name in the global namespace of regulator_map_list. I worked > > around that by adding an ID counter to produce a unique name for each, > > though that changes device names in userspace-visible ways that I'm > > not sure would be considered OK for backwards compatibility. (I'm not > > familiar enough with the regulator code to know if there's a better > > way of fixing that problem.) The #if-ing to keep it behind a Kconfig
> Maybe ask that question on the regulator mailing list.
I can't really tell what the issue is here without more context, the global name list should not be relevant for much in a system that's well configured so it sounds like it's user error. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |