Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Mar 2021 05:54:06 +0300 | From | Jarkko Sakkinen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] IMA: Fix error in comment |
| |
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 08:08:45AM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda wrote: > ima_file_mprotect does not return EACCES but EPERM. > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
/Jarkko
> --- > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > index 9ef748ea829f..716ea29cf897 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot) > * this point. Eliminate this integrity gap by denying the mprotect > * PROT_EXECUTE change, if an mmap appraise policy rule exists. > * > - * On mprotect change success, return 0. On failure, return -EACESS. > + * On mprotect change success, return 0. On failure, return -EPERM. > */ > int ima_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long prot) > { > -- > 2.31.0.291.g576ba9dcdaf-goog > >
| |