lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -tip v3 05/11] x86/kprobes: Add UNWIND_HINT_FUNC on kretprobe_trampoline code
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:52:03 -0500
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 10:05:43PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 21:16:16 +0900
> > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 21:22:39 +0900
> > > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > Add UNWIND_HINT_FUNC on kretporbe_trampoline code so that ORC
> > > > information is generated on the kretprobe_trampoline correctly.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Test bot also found a new warning for this.
> > >
> > > > >> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.o: warning: objtool: kretprobe_trampoline()+0x25: call without frame pointer save/setup
> > >
> > > With CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y.
> > >
> > > Of course this can be fixed with additional "push %bp; mov %sp, %bp" before calling
> > > trampoline_handler. But actually we know that this function has a bit special
> > > stack frame too.
> > >
> > > Can I recover STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(kretprobe_trampoline) when CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y ?
> >
> > So something like this. Does it work?
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> > index b31058a152b6..651f337dc880 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> > @@ -760,6 +760,10 @@ int kprobe_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > }
> > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_int3_handler);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> > +#undef UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
> > +#define UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
> > +#endif
>
> This hunk isn't necessary. The unwind hints don't actually have an
> effect with frame pointers.

Without this, objtool shows the following warning with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y.

arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.o: warning: objtool: kretprobe_trampoline()+0x1: BUG: why am I validating an ignored function?

It seems to complain about putting UNWIND_HINT on STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD function.

>
> > /*
> > * When a retprobed function returns, this code saves registers and
> > * calls trampoline_handler() runs, which calls the kretprobe's handler.
> > @@ -797,7 +801,14 @@ asm(
> > ".size kretprobe_trampoline, .-kretprobe_trampoline\n"
> > );
> > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kretprobe_trampoline);
> > -
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> > +/*
> > + * kretprobe_trampoline skips updating frame pointer. The frame pointer
> > + * saved in trampoline_handler points to the real caller function's
> > + * frame pointer.
> > + */
> > +STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(kretprobe_trampoline);
> > +#endif
> >
> > /*
> > * Called from kretprobe_trampoline
>
> Ack.

Thank you!

>
> --
> Josh
>


--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-22 01:10    [W:0.040 / U:1.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site