lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo
Date


> On Mar 20, 2021, at 17:16, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> s/particuar/particular/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
> * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
> * otherwise the device will error.
> - * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> + * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
> * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
> * context is referenced in the command stream.
> --
> 2.26.2
>

Looks good. I’ll push it through the drm-misc tree on my next series. Unless of course you want to push it through a different tree in which case:
Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>

z
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-21 20:20    [W:0.879 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site