Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:06:27 +0200 | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] parport: Introduce module_parport_driver() helper macro |
| |
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 02:51:45PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 12:12 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:27:10PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 07:03:09PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > Introduce module_parport_driver() helper macro to reduce boilerplate > > > > > in the existing and new code. > > > > > > > > Sudip, any comments on this? > > > > > > Sorry for the delay in reply. > > > lgtm. I think there are few more drivers which can also use this new helper. > > > Will you like to do them also? > > > > Yes, that's the (slow going) plan. > > > > > Acked-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> > > > > Thanks! I considered that you take it thru parport tree. Do you have something > > else in mind? > > I dont have a separate parport tree (parport is not under active > development to have a separate tree). I send everything parport > related to Greg and then he adds it to his tree.
MAINTAINERS doesn't show this. But good to know.
> I guess in this case if Greg agrees it can go via Mark's tree as the > series will also have SPI related patches.
Okay, if Greg wants to handle this himself, I think I have to resend (he wasn't in the Cc list). Otherwise Mark can also apply this if Greg is okay (but sounds like I have to resend anyway to let him understand what's going on here).
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| |