lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 10/14] objtool: Extract elf_symbol_add()
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:54:05AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 09:14:03PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 06:11:13PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Create a common helper to add symbols.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > ---
> > > tools/objtool/elf.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --- a/tools/objtool/elf.c
> > > +++ b/tools/objtool/elf.c
> > > @@ -290,12 +290,41 @@ static int read_sections(struct elf *elf
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static bool elf_symbol_add(struct elf *elf, struct symbol *sym)
> >
> > How about "elf_add_symbol()" for consistency with my other suggestions
> > (elf_add_reloc() and elf_add_string()). And return an int.
>
> Changed the nane, how about void? This latest incarnation doesn't
> actually have an error path. Still doesn't hurt to have one and not use
> it I suppose...

void would be my preference, just to avoid unnecessary error handling
boilerplate in the caller.

--
Josh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-19 16:06    [W:0.077 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site