lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 12/14] objtool: Allow archs to rewrite retpolines
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 09:54:40PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 06:11:15PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > @@ -1212,6 +1225,8 @@ static int handle_group_alt(struct objto
> > dest_off = arch_jump_destination(insn);
> > if (dest_off == special_alt->new_off + special_alt->new_len)
> > insn->jump_dest = next_insn_same_sec(file, last_orig_insn);
> > + else
> > + insn->jump_dest = find_insn(file, insn->sec, dest_off);
> >
> > if (!insn->jump_dest) {
> > WARN_FUNC("can't find alternative jump destination",
>
> So I assume this change is because of the ordering change: now this is
> done before add_jump_destinations().

Correct.

> Also the new hunk to be an oversimplified version of
> add_jump_destinations(). I'm not quite convinced that it will always do
> the right thing for this case.

You're right; this is because of the reorder. At the time I thought this
was right, but looking at it now, I'm not sure. Esp. so when ARM64 comes
along and allows more relocations in alternatives.

Let me see if I can come up with something better.

> But doesn't that mean the alternative jump modification (changing the
> dest to the end of the original insns) will get overwritten later?

Good point, should be simple enough to fix by having
add_jump_destination() skip all that already have insn->jump_dest set I
suppose.

> > @@ -1797,11 +1812,15 @@ static int decode_sections(struct objtoo
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - ret = add_jump_destinations(file);
> > + /*
> > + * Must be before add_{jump,call}_destination; for they can add
> > + * magic alternatives.
> > + */
> > + ret = add_special_section_alts(file);
>
> This reordering is unfortunate. Maybe there's a better way, though I
> don't have any ideas, at least until I get to the most controversial
> patch.

So the thing no longer crashes on the alternatives it writes, so we
*could* read back our own alternatives, but it does seem somewhat
unfortunate to do that. Too easy to get into cycles that way.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-19 12:22    [W:0.078 / U:5.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site