Messages in this thread | | | From | "Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)" <> | Subject | RE: A problem of Intel IOMMU hardware ? | Date | Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:38:58 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tian, Kevin [mailto:kevin.tian@intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 4:27 PM > To: Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.) > <longpeng2@huawei.com>; Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> > Cc: chenjiashang <chenjiashang@huawei.com>; David Woodhouse > <dwmw2@infradead.org>; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; LKML > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; alex.williamson@redhat.com; Gonglei (Arei) > <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>; will@kernel.org > Subject: RE: A problem of Intel IOMMU hardware ? > > > From: iommu <iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org> On Behalf Of > > Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.) > > > > > 2. Consider ensuring that the problem is not somehow related to > > > queued invalidations. Try to use __iommu_flush_iotlb() instead of > qi_flush_iotlb(). > > > > > > > I tried to force to use __iommu_flush_iotlb(), but maybe something > > wrong, the system crashed, so I prefer to lower the priority of this operation. > > > > The VT-d spec clearly says that register-based invalidation can be used only when > queued-invalidations are not enabled. Intel-IOMMU driver doesn't provide an > option to disable queued-invalidation though, when the hardware is capable. If you > really want to try, tweak the code in intel_iommu_init_qi. >
Hi Kevin,
Thanks to point out this. Do you have any ideas about this problem ? I tried to descript the problem much clear in my reply to Alex, hope you could have a look if you're interested.
> Thanks > Kevin
| |