lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] MIPS/bpf: Enable bpf_probe_read{, str}() on MIPS again
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:18:48PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 3/17/21 8:15 AM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> > After commit 0ebeea8ca8a4 ("bpf: Restrict bpf_probe_read{, str}() only to
> > archs where they work"), bpf_probe_read{, str}() functions were not longer
> > available on MIPS, so there exists some errors when running bpf program:
> >
> > root@linux:/home/loongson/bcc# python examples/tracing/task_switch.py
> > bpf: Failed to load program: Invalid argument
> > [...]
> > 11: (85) call bpf_probe_read#4
> > unknown func bpf_probe_read#4
> > [...]
> > Exception: Failed to load BPF program count_sched: Invalid argument
> >
> > So select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE in arch/mips/Kconfig,
> > otherwise the bpf old helper bpf_probe_read() will not be available.
> >
> > This is similar with the commit d195b1d1d1196 ("powerpc/bpf: Enable
> > bpf_probe_read{, str}() on powerpc again").
> >
> > Fixes: 0ebeea8ca8a4 ("bpf: Restrict bpf_probe_read{, str}() only to archs where they work")
> > Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
>
> Thomas, I presume you pick this up via mips tree (with typos fixed)? Or do you
> want us to route the fix via bpf with your ACK? (I'm fine either way.)

I'll take it via mips tree.

Thomas.

--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-18 00:10    [W:0.045 / U:0.476 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site