Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/vmemmap: Handle unpopulated sub-pmd ranges | From | David Hildenbrand <> | Date | Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:38:21 +0100 |
| |
On 10.03.21 22:58, Oscar Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 06:58:26PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Thinking again, I guess it might be a good idea to factor out the core >> functions into common code. For the optimization part, it might make sense >> too pass some "state" structure that contains e.g., "unused_pmd_start". > > Yeah, that really sounds like a good thing to do. > >> >> Then we don't have diverging implementations of essentially the same thing. >> >> Of course, we can do that on top of this series - unifying both >> implementations. > > I would rather do it on top of this series, not because I am lazy, but > rather fairly busy and I will not be able to spend much time on it > anytime soon. > > Once this series gets merged, I commit to have a look into that. >
Sure, makes sense - thanks!
-- Thanks,
David / dhildenb
| |