lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/vmemmap: Handle unpopulated sub-pmd ranges
From
Date
On 10.03.21 22:58, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 06:58:26PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Thinking again, I guess it might be a good idea to factor out the core
>> functions into common code. For the optimization part, it might make sense
>> too pass some "state" structure that contains e.g., "unused_pmd_start".
>
> Yeah, that really sounds like a good thing to do.
>
>>
>> Then we don't have diverging implementations of essentially the same thing.
>>
>> Of course, we can do that on top of this series - unifying both
>> implementations.
>
> I would rather do it on top of this series, not because I am lazy, but
> rather fairly busy and I will not be able to spend much time on it
> anytime soon.
>
> Once this series gets merged, I commit to have a look into that.
>

Sure, makes sense - thanks!


--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-11 17:39    [W:0.050 / U:0.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site