lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] iommu/tegra-smmu: Fix mc errors on tegra124-nyan
From
Date
11.03.2021 01:17, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:22:57PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 10.03.2021 22:13, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>> I found that this patch introduced a serious regression on Tegra30 using
>>> today's linux-next. Tegra30 has two 3d h/w blocks connected in SLI and
>>> only one of the blocks is now attached to IOMMU domain, meaning that GPU
>>> is unusable now. All 3d, 2d and display devices share the same "DRM"
>>> group on Tegra30.
>>>
>>> Nicolin, please let me know if have any suggestions. I may take a closer
>>> look a day later, for now I'll just revert this patch locally. Thanks in
>>> advance.
>>>
>>
>> Actually, this was easy to fix:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
>> index 97eb62f667d2..639d5ceab60b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
>> @@ -853,8 +853,6 @@ static struct iommu_device
>> *tegra_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>>
>> if (err < 0)
>> return ERR_PTR(err);
>> -
>> - break;
>
> Hmm..I don't understand why this "break" causes problems on Tegra30.
> The older versions that used _find()+configure() had it also, e.g.:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.9.16/source/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c#L760
>
> Dmitry, do you have any idea?
>

The older variant of tegra_smmu_attach_dev() didn't use fwspec [1], that
makes the difference. In other words, the older variant of
tegra_smmu_probe_device() was already buggy, but the bug was masked by
the tegra_smmu_attach_dev() that didn't use the fwspec.

[1]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.10.22/source/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c#L476

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-11 13:07    [W:0.138 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site