lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf separately
From
Date
On 11/03/2021 11:16, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 3/11/21 11:57 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Static analysis on linux-next with Coverity has found a potential issue
>> in drivers/pinctrl/core.c with the following commit:
>>
>> commit 0952b7ec1614abf232e921aac0cc2bca8e60e162
>> Author: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
>> Date: Wed Mar 10 09:16:54 2021 +0100
>>
>> pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf separately
>>
>> The analysis is as follows:
>>
>> 1234 /**
>> 1235 * pinctrl_commit_state() - select/activate/program a pinctrl state
>> to HW
>> 1236 * @p: the pinctrl handle for the device that requests configuration
>> 1237 * @state: the state handle to select/activate/program
>> 1238 */
>> 1239 static int pinctrl_commit_state(struct pinctrl *p, struct
>> pinctrl_state *state)
>> 1240 {
>> 1241 struct pinctrl_setting *setting, *setting2;
>> 1242 struct pinctrl_state *old_state = p->state;
>>
>> 1. var_decl: Declaring variable ret without initializer.
>>
>> 1243 int ret;
>> 1244
>>
>> 2. Condition p->state, taking true branch.
>>
>> 1245 if (p->state) {
>> 1246 /*
>> 1247 * For each pinmux setting in the old state, forget
>> SW's record
>> 1248 * of mux owner for that pingroup. Any pingroups
>> which are
>> 1249 * still owned by the new state will be re-acquired
>> by the call
>> 1250 * to pinmux_enable_setting() in the loop below.
>> 1251 */
>>
>> 3. Condition 0 /* !!(!__builtin_types_compatible_p() &&
>> !__builtin_types_compatible_p()) */, taking false branch.
>> 4. Condition !(&setting->node == &p->state->settings), taking true
>> branch.
>> 7. Condition 0 /* !!(!__builtin_types_compatible_p() &&
>> !__builtin_types_compatible_p()) */, taking false branch.
>> 8. Condition !(&setting->node == &p->state->settings), taking true
>> branch.
>> 11. Condition 0 /* !!(!__builtin_types_compatible_p() &&
>> !__builtin_types_compatible_p()) */, taking false branch.
>> 12. Condition !(&setting->node == &p->state->settings), taking false
>> branch.
>>
>> 1252 list_for_each_entry(setting, &p->state->settings,
>> node) {
>>
>> 5. Condition setting->type != PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, taking true
>> branch.
>> 9. Condition setting->type != PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, taking true
>> branch.
>> 1253 if (setting->type != PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP)
>> 6. Continuing loop.
>> 10. Continuing loop.
>>
>> 1254 continue;
>> 1255 pinmux_disable_setting(setting);
>> 1256 }
>> 1257 }
>> 1258
>> 1259 p->state = NULL;
>> 1260
>> 1261 /* Apply all the settings for the new state - pinmux first */
>>
>> 13. Condition 0 /* !!(!__builtin_types_compatible_p() &&
>> !__builtin_types_compatible_p()) */, taking false branch.
>> 14. Condition !(&setting->node == &state->settings), taking true branch.
>> 1262 list_for_each_entry(setting, &state->settings, node) {
>> 15. Switch case value PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN.
>>
>> 1263 switch (setting->type) {
>> 1264 case PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP:
>> 1265 ret = pinmux_enable_setting(setting);
>> 1266 break;
>> 1267 case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN:
>> 1268 case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP:
>>
>> 16. Breaking from switch.
>>
>> 1269 break;
>> 1270 default:
>> 1271 ret = -EINVAL;
>> 1272 break;
>> 1273 }
>> 1274
>>
>> Uninitialized scalar variable (UNINIT)
>> 17. uninit_use: Using uninitialized value ret.
>>
>> 1275 if (ret < 0)
>> 1276 goto unapply_new_state;
>>
>> For the PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN and PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP
>> setting->type cases the loop can break out with ret not being set. Since
>> ret has not been initialized it the ret < 0 check is checking against an
>> uninitialized value.
>>
>> I was not sure if the PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN and
>> PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP cases should be setting ret and if so, what
>> the value of ret should be set to (is it an error condition or not?). Or
>> should ret be initialized to 0 or a default error value at the start of
>> the function.
>>
>> Hence I'm reporting this issue.
>
> What about this? Is this passing static analysis?

It will take me 2 hours to re-run the analysis, but from eyeballing the
code I think the assignments will fix this.

Colin

>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> index f5c32d2a3c91..136c323d855e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> @@ -1266,6 +1266,7 @@ static int pinctrl_commit_state(struct pinctrl *p,
> struct pinctrl_state *state)
> break;
> case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN:
> case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP:
> + ret = 0;
> break;
> default:
> ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -1284,6 +1285,7 @@ static int pinctrl_commit_state(struct pinctrl *p,
> struct pinctrl_state *state)
> list_for_each_entry(setting, &state->settings, node) {
> switch (setting->type) {
> case PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP:
> + ret = 0;
> break;
> case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN:
> case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP:
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-11 12:26    [W:0.110 / U:0.536 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site