lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Process-wide watchpoints
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:38 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 7:28 PM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
> > Not directly related to the above question, but related to my use case.
> > Could we extend bpf_perf_event_data with some more data re breakpoint events?
> >
> > struct bpf_perf_event_data {
> > bpf_user_pt_regs_t regs;
> > __u64 sample_period;
> > __u64 addr;
> > };
> >
> > Ideally, I would like to have an actual access address, size and
> > read/write type (may not match bp addr/size). Is that info easily
> > available at the point of bpf hook call?
> > Or, if that's not available at least breakpoint bp_type/bp_size.
> >
> > Is it correct that we can materialize in bpf_perf_event_data anything
> > that's available in bpf_perf_event_data_kern (if it makes sense in the
> > public interface of course)?
> >
> > struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern {
> > bpf_user_pt_regs_t *regs;
> > struct perf_sample_data *data;
> > struct perf_event *event;
> > };
> >
> > Unfortunately I don't see perf_event_attr.bp_type/bp_size
> > stored/accessible anywhere in bpf_perf_event_data_kern. What would be
> > the right way to expose them in bpf_perf_event_data?
>
> I think you can access it via event->attr.bp_type/size in the struct
> bpf_perf_event_data_kern.


Hi Namhyung,

Right, that's I need. Thanks.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-04 09:13    [W:0.114 / U:4.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site