Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:17:27 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: schedutil: Call sugov_update_next_freq() before check to fast_switch_enabled |
| |
On 24-02-21, 14:39, Yue Hu wrote: > From: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com> > > Note that sugov_update_next_freq() may return false, that means the > caller sugov_fast_switch() will do nothing except fast switch check. > > Similarly, sugov_deferred_update() also has unnecessary operations > of raw_spin_{lock,unlock} in sugov_update_single_freq() for that case. > > So, let's call sugov_update_next_freq() before the fast switch check > to avoid unnecessary behaviors above. Accordingly, update interface > definition to sugov_deferred_update() and remove sugov_fast_switch() > since we will call cpufreq_driver_fast_switch() directly instead. > > Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com> > --- > v2: remove sugov_fast_switch() and call cpufreq_driver_fast_switch() > directly instead, also update minor log message. > > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 29 ++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> -- viresh
| |